|
502
Double Agentry: Offensive
Counterintelligence Operations
Building on the
foundation forged in our 501 Course, this course primarily focuses on
counterintelligence events that changed history and the value and need
to conduct offensive double-agent operations. There is a deliberate
effort to facilitate the course participants’ ability to understand and
overcome institutional cultural opposition to double agentry.
The
students participate in a day-long case study of the Oleg Penkovsky
CIA/MI6 operation. They are exposed to two conflicting analyses of Penkovsky’s bona fides in consecutive nightly readings and the impact
such assessments can have on national policy. This culminates in a
detailed case study in which the students draw conclusions on the
validity of the intelligence produced by this operation.
Students study
two successful double agent operations, and draw conclusions concerning
the value of each to the USIC.
The course includes a detailed
examination of the methods used by foreign intelligence/security and
counterintelligence services to assess and conduct recruitment
operations against US government personnel assigned overseas.
A day-long
lecture illustrates the complex inter-connectivity and analyzes a series
of events including espionage cases, penetrations of intelligence
services and the conduct of offensive double agentry. [5 days]
Course Topics
© Copyright
The Centre for Counterintelligence and Security
Studies/David G. Major Associates, Inc.
Offensive Approaches to Counterintelligence
Operations and the Theory of Double Agentry
- Why and how intelligence and CI Services run Double
Agents
- Enigmas: What can be learned from Double Agents
- The 12 cardinal principles of planning for and
implementing Double Agent operations
Through the Eyes of a Double Agent
Cassidy’s Run/Shocker Operation
- An example of a Long-term Dangle Double Agent
Operation
- The strategic pitfalls of deception operations
Operation Solo
Security and Counterintelligence Assessment and
Recruitment Operations: The challenges to U.S. embassies
- The Soviet/Russian Model
- Civil War Spies
- The use of FSNs to target Tyler Kent and Henry
Antheil in Moscow, 1933-1940
- Key lessons in the Beck Report (security survey
of the American Embassy in Moscow, 1940)
- The use of FSNs to target and recruit Clayton
Lonetree in Moscow
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s View and
Insights into Penetration Agents, “Molehunts” and Double
Agentry
- Gouzenko, a GRU defector, and his leads to a “mole”
in British intelligence
- Gideon, a KGB Defector, and Long Knife, a KGB
penetration (mole)
- An overview of the British and American “molehunts”
of the late 50’s and 60’s
- The Canadian molehunt (Gridiron) and its
repercussions
- The Tango Penetration and its impact on the RCMP and
Allied Services
- Obstacle Course and Gold Mine: KGB and RCMP Double
Agentry
Triple
Cross: Following the Trail of Terror Against America: How an
Al-Qaeda Spy Penetrated the US Intelligence Community
-
The
Disturbing Case of Ali Mohamed
-
U.S. Naturalized Citizen, U.S. Soldier, al-Qaeda Spy and
Terrorist
-
Collecting and Connecting the Dots with the Benefit of
Hindsight
-
Nexus of Many Terrorists and their Attacks from
1984-1998
-
USIC Penetration of a NYC al-Qaeda Cell
-
Successes and Failures
History of Double Agent Operations Conducted by
US Counterintelligence
Offensive Approaches to Counterintelligence
Policy: Operation FAMISH
- A case study of resolving interagency conflict and
protecting US national interest
The Penkovsky Case Study: “Double Agent or Bona
Fides Agent?”
- Counterintelligence analysis, agent validation and
acting on agent information during a national crisis:
1959-1963
- Placing Penkovsky in context with U-2 pilot Gary
Powers, the Bay of Pigs, Berlin, Summits and the Cuban
Missile Crisis
- A review of the case
- An analysis of the Peter Wright analysis
- A counterintelligence analysis
- An analysis of the IRONBARK material
Feedback
“I have a better understanding of double agents and how
it’s used against us. Definitely see lesson on how history
repeats itself.”
“I came into the course with almost no knowledge of
Double Agent Operations. I have learned an incredible amount
of information in just one week. All the instructors were
extremely knowledgeable on the subject matter, and imparted
this knowledge to us through the interactive discussions. I
will pursue additional training opportunities through the CI
Centre in the future. This course introduced me to a topic I
never really considered before. I will better familiarize
myself with the content of this course through books, etc.
and hope to participate in such operations through my work
experience in the future."
“Excellent course I would recommend to anyone. I can’t
believe how much I learned and can take back with me. I will
be back for more classes.”
“This is an excellent course in Double Agentry. All the
instructors were excellent in their presentations. The
instructors also creatively and efficiently generated class
participation. In all, CI training at its best.”
“A masterful set of lectures—very well done! I’m
recommending this to other intel analysts.”
“Most of the presenters are excellent in delivering class
instruction—very highly detailed, enthusiastic and
passionate, etc. I would recommend this course to
anyone—analysts, agents, officers—anyone who works in the CI
field. Because of this course, I have learned to think
deeper, and in all directions—don’t get locked in a box!”
“It was much more interesting and informative to hear the
info from people who have lived the content. It is obvious
their knowledge is academically based as well as deep
immersion into actual operations.”
“The information provided in the course is so completely
appropriate. It will be of great value in my current
assignment. Presentation was excellent. This course has
changed my view; I need more training.”
“Excellent review of case studies and survey of offensive
CI principles.”
“The course has made me more aware of DA ops and to not
have a narrow-minded view of CI cases.”
“Incredibly professional and interesting course. Highly
recommend to all my colleagues.”
“Very good. Will help with my work.”
“Great to get a lot of detailed history having grown up
during the time of many of the events. Didn’t realize the
activities of Cuban Missile Crisis, almost brought us close
to war. Helpful to get an understanding of the work analysis
and thought process that analytic people go through in this
process. Better understand the difficulty that our people
have doing their job evaluating information.”
“Gave me an excellent understanding of DA ops which
previously I had not been exposed to.”
“This is my first CI course. It gave me a good starting
point into CI operations. Was able to learn new
terms/strategies and techniques surrounding agents/double
agents.”
“Very informative course. All presenters were quite
knowledgeable and contributed a wealth of information to the
class.
“As a result of this course, I’ve become even more
adverse to snap judgments. I’ve become even more aware of
how difficult this work is.”
“This course reinforces personal knowledge. How I look at
things and new ways or approaches to view or approach
things. No pain no gain. Teaches younger officers that risk
taking is necessary in this business! Want to come back for
more.”
"Information presented in this course will help me
perform CI-related duties on a daily basis, especially how
Double Agent (DA) operations are conducted and what
practices are best for asset validation.”
“These CI courses have increased my awareness and
interest so much that I have taken a CI assignment.”
“Relevant, educational, GREAT presenters.”
“This course made me look at issues differently.”
“I’ve added A LOT of tools to my CI toolbox. Everyone
could benefit from this training, even non-CI folks.”
“Very educational and eye-opening to know what was going
on “behind the scenes” as history took place. Your research
and analysis is outstanding! This course has definitely
changed my view towards CI; the military doesn’t offer this
level of detailed/researched information (lessons learned).”
“This course helped widen my appreciation of DA
operations and the number of questions they can be used to
answer.”
“Great course. The information presented clarified the
world of Double Agent ops. As a CT guy, you showed me the
complexity of the CI world.”
“The entire experience was outstanding, to include the
facilities and staff. As a SIGINTer, I have little
experience with the CI side of the house and found this
course to be highly informative. Now that I have had this
course, I feel that my support to the CI community will be
much better. Thanks!!”
“Excellent, great. I loved how the instructors are able
to intermix methodology with content through the case
studies. I have almost never seen anything like
it—incredible impressive!”
“This was an excellent course! To a new employee working
CI, I found this course to be invaluable. Not only did I
learn a lot, but it also made me excited about my new
career.”
“Made me think.”
“Value to be found nowhere else.”
“As a result of this course, I have more operational
appreciation.”
“Penkovsky case study was extremely useful and very
interesting.”
“Thank you for continuing to serve your country by
providing this instruction. It is invaluable. Very, very
good.”
“I enjoyed that the instructors provided what was
happening in the world as a backdrop for specific FI and CI
operations. I think we tend to view events in isolation and
lost the holistic analytical approach. Appreciate the human
perspective tied to the clinical CI perspective.”
“I really enjoyed the course and the exposure into double
agentry. I definitely learned the concepts.”
“CI is a complex play. There are always new ways, but you
must have the experience. This course gives a very good
basic overall view of CI. Excellent course.”
“This course has given me a much better understand and
grasp of the history and tradecraft of intelligence and
counterintelligence. It also has given me a great
appreciation of the operations side of intel.”
“Case study on Penkovsky was terrific. Great way to
exercise the analytics of asset validation.”
“Excellent course. I think I enjoyed it more than 501,
which I also enjoyed. Your teaching style suits me very well
as a visual learner and I can’t express enough gratitude for
your implementation of technology. The audio/visual
presentations are great. Very professional courses which
always set themselves apart from the typical boring
government brief. Thanks for the books—keeps my CI library
growing.” |